Submitting OIG:
Report Description:
Our objective was to determine whether USPTO’s patent application classification and routing processes were effective. Specifically, we determined whether (1) USPTO adequately ensured that classification contractors were providing quality patent classification and reclassification services; (2) USPTO examiners properly challenged claim indicator (known as “C-star” or C*) classifications and whether USPTO properly resolved challenges; and (3) USPTO effectively designed and implemented Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system-based routing.
We found that USPTO’s patent classification and routing processes were not effective. Specifically, we found that:
I. USPTO did not ensure effective contract oversight for classification services.
II. USPTO lacked adequate controls to ensure that classification challenges were efficiently and effectively submitted and adjudicated.
III. USPTO did not effectively design and implement CPC-based routing.
Short / Alternative Report Title:
Final Report No. OIG-23-026-A
Date Issued:
Wednesday, August 30, 2023
Agency Reviewed / Investigated:
Submitting OIG-Specific Report Number:
OIG-23-026-A
Component, if applicable:
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Location(s):
Agency-Wide
Type of Report:
Audit
Questioned Costs:
$0
Funds for Better Use:
$0
Number of Recommendations:
7
Report updated under NDAA 5274:
No
View Document:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
SECURED-OIG-23-026.pdf | 1.11 MB |
Additional Details Link: